Registration and sale of offshore companies

Thank you for keeping me informed. Mastered the information.

Let’s go through the order.

1. It’s clear about Belize, we expect any specifics from your partners. We’ll decide further.

2. Gibraltar is not suitable. Since we decided at the main meeting that the company will be focused on foreigners (how they relate to the CIS countries, you understand) and even if the registers are “closed”, it is not desirable that the final beneficiary (our relatives) is listed in the register of owners. At most, it should be visible only in the register of powers of attorney.

3. The UK, like Panama, is also not suitable (unfortunately, people from the CIS have registered a lot of “dirt” there), the EU - can be considered subject to the loyal attitude of the authorities to the regulation of cryptocurrency. Recently, Europeans have fought against bitcoin and everything connected with it. Tightening is going on all fronts - from AML&KYC to tax burden (not only income tax is introduced for transactions with cryptocurrencies, but also other types of taxes - analogues of VAT, capital increase tax, etc.). In my opinion, Luxembourg, Spain and Estonia were the most loyal European jurisdictions. But it needs to be double-checked in practice. Therefore, the priority will be to find such a jurisdiction where cryptocurrency has been legalized (Japan, Singapore) and a special license for its turnover is issued - financial or its analogue (although here I immediately draw your attention, it is necessary to find out from the regulator: within the framework of such a license, in addition to working with the “crypt”, whether the possibility of “fiat” in-out through bank accounts, Visa/MasterCard merchant is given).

The budget is a ciring issue. Up to $100,000 for a license and a company with a “turnkey” denomination - in principle, lifting things. I suppose plus 50k to these 100k, exclusively as a force majeure, can be laid, a total of 150k and this is perhaps the ceiling, which at the moment is more than tatachable. We’ll see further. In general, any serious figures require my approval with partners and it is necessary to clearly understand the causal relationship, as well as what will happen at the exit.

4. The most optimistic, IMHO, for study at the moment are jurisdictions, where either there is no regulation of cryptocurrencies at all or it is minimized. The example with Mauritius is not unique. As an option, the same Labuan. There are also such “gambling” jurisdictions as the Isle of Main, Malta and Curacao. They look very transparently at “high-risk” financial transactions. Perhaps they have formed a regulatory framework and licensing practice for “critical projects”.

Https://https://www.twine.net/signin