I am a Ph.D. scientist and engineer with over 6 years of experience in technical writing, scientific editing, and complex document preparation. I specialize in helping non-native English speakers polish their manuscripts, theses, and reports to meet the rigorous standards of top-tier international journals. What I Can Do For You: Scientific Copy Editing: I don't just fix grammar; I improve flow, logic, and readability while preserving technical accuracy. I have extensive experience editing for ESL researchers in multidisciplinary fields (Physics, Engineering, Neuroscience). Technical Documentation: I can transform complex R&D processes into clear, user-friendly Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and manuals. Grant & Proposal Writing: I have co-authored proposals that secured over $350,000 in research funding. My Background: Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering (Polytechnique Montréal) B.Sc. in Physics Author of 7 Peer-Reviewed Publications Whether you need a final polish on a journal submission or a clear technical guide for your team, I bring doctoral-level attention to detail to every project.

Jo’Elen Hagler, Ph.D.

PRO

I am a Ph.D. scientist and engineer with over 6 years of experience in technical writing, scientific editing, and complex document preparation. I specialize in helping non-native English speakers polish their manuscripts, theses, and reports to meet the rigorous standards of top-tier international journals. What I Can Do For You: Scientific Copy Editing: I don't just fix grammar; I improve flow, logic, and readability while preserving technical accuracy. I have extensive experience editing for ESL researchers in multidisciplinary fields (Physics, Engineering, Neuroscience). Technical Documentation: I can transform complex R&D processes into clear, user-friendly Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and manuals. Grant & Proposal Writing: I have co-authored proposals that secured over $350,000 in research funding. My Background: Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering (Polytechnique Montréal) B.Sc. in Physics Author of 7 Peer-Reviewed Publications Whether you need a final polish on a journal submission or a clear technical guide for your team, I bring doctoral-level attention to detail to every project.

Available to hire

I am a Ph.D. scientist and engineer with over 6 years of experience in technical writing, scientific editing, and complex document preparation. I specialize in helping non-native English speakers polish their manuscripts, theses, and reports to meet the rigorous standards of top-tier international journals.

What I Can Do For You:

Scientific Copy Editing: I don’t just fix grammar; I improve flow, logic, and readability while preserving technical accuracy. I have extensive experience editing for ESL researchers in multidisciplinary fields (Physics, Engineering, Neuroscience).

Technical Documentation: I can transform complex R&D processes into clear, user-friendly Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and manuals.

Grant & Proposal Writing: I have co-authored proposals that secured over $350,000 in research funding.

My Background:

Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering (Polytechnique Montréal)

B.Sc. in Physics

Author of 7 Peer-Reviewed Publications

Whether you need a final polish on a journal submission or a clear technical guide for your team, I bring doctoral-level attention to detail to every project.

See more

Language

English
Fluent
French
Beginner

Work Experience

Lead Scientific Editor & Researcher at Polytechnique Montreal
August 31, 2018 - May 31, 2025
Served as the primary English-language editor for a diverse, international research group. Edited and refined theses, manuscripts, and technical reports for non-native English speakers, correcting grammar, syntax, and logical flow to ensure native-level fluency. Managed the complete publication lifecycle for 7 peer-reviewed journal articles (e.g., Advanced Materials Interfaces) and co-authored grant proposals that secured over $350,000 in funding. Authored comprehensive Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for complex laboratory equipment.
Research Scientist & Author (Undergraduate) at Western Washington University
September 1, 2016 - June 1, 2018
Led an independent research study on biomedical polymers that resulted in a first-author publication in the Journal of Applied Polymer Science (2019). Responsible for all data visualization, manuscript preparation, and the submission process. Developed foundational skills in technical writing and experimental design.

Education

Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering at Polytechnique Montreal
September 1, 2018 - June 1, 2025
Specialization: Biomedical Devices & Technical Communication. Key Achievements: Authored and published 7 peer-reviewed journal articles. Co-authored a successful $250,000 NFRF research grant proposal. Developed comprehensive technical manuals (SOPs) for microfabrication equipment. Served as the primary scientific editor for a multidisciplinary research group.
B.Sc. in Physics (Minor in Mathematics) at Western Washington University
September 1, 2014 - June 1, 2018
Research Focus: Biomedical Device Technology. Key Achievement: Led an independent research project that resulted in a first-author publication in the Journal of Applied Polymer Science (2019), demonstrating advanced technical writing skills at the undergraduate level.

Qualifications

Grant Co-Author ($250k Award)
September 1, 2022 - September 1, 2024
Key technical contributor and co-author for a winning New Frontiers in Research Fund (NFRF) Exploration Grant. Synthesized complex preliminary data into a compelling narrative to secure $250,000 in research funding.
Scientific Peer Reviewer & Editor
September 1, 2020 - August 31, 2025
Invited peer reviewer for high-impact international journals including Advanced Materials, Advanced Materials Interfaces, Advanced Healthcare Materials, Advanced Materials Technologies, and Journal of Neural Engineering. Additionally served as the Lead Internal Editor for a multidisciplinary research group, providing comprehensive scientific and linguistic review for over 15 manuscripts and theses prior to submission.

Industry Experience

Education, Life Sciences, Professional Services, Other, Healthcare, Manufacturing
    paper Technical Documentation: Laboratory Protocols & SOPs

    Project Overview

    I specialize in creating high-precision Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for chemical and biological engineering. This sample demonstrates my ability to document complex wet-lab protocols that require strict adherence to timing, temperature, and stoichiometry.

    Context:
    This protocol was developed to standardize the production of silk fibroin solutions for use in biodegradable neural interfaces. It transforms a variable raw material (cocoons) into a precisely quantified medical-grade solution.

    Sample: Aqueous Silk Solution Preparation

    1. Degumming (Sericin Removal)

    • Preparation: Rapidly boil 3L of 0.02 M Na2CO3 solution. Note: Ensure the hot plate is set to maximum; heating 3L of water takes ~1 hour. Plan accordingly.
    • Boiling: Add cut silk cocoon pieces only when water is rapidly boiling (large bubbles). Simmering water is insufficient for complete sericin removal.
    • Duration: Boil for exactly 60 minutes, stirring intermittently.
    • Rinsing: Transfer silk to boiling deionized (DI) water for 20 mins, then rinse three times in room-temperature DI water to remove salt residues.

    2. Dissolution & Dialysis

    • Solvent: Dissolve dried silk fibers in 9.3 M Lithium Bromide (LiBr) at 60°C for 1-3 hours.
      • Calculation: Vol(LiBr) = Mass(Silk) × (100 mL / 20 g).
    • Dialysis: Inject solution into 3.5k MWCO dialysis tubing. Dialyze against 1L of DI water for 48 hours, changing the water at 1h, 4h, and 24h intervals to ensure complete salt removal.

    3. Concentration Adjustment
    After filtration, the final concentration is adjusted to 7-8% (w/v) using gravimetric analysis.

    Adjustment Calculation:
    To reduce concentration to target, use the dilution equation: Vi x Ci = Vf x Cf

    • Example: If you have 6 mL of 11% solution and target 7%:
      • 6 mL x 11% = Vf x 7%
      • Vf = 9.43 mL
      • Action: Add 3.43 mL of DI water to reach the target volume.
    paper Scientific Peer Review & Editing

    Project Overview

    As a Ph.D. scientist, I provide critical peer review and editorial services. This redacted sample demonstrates my ability to evaluate scientific rigor, methodology, and logic. I have extensive experience editing manuscripts for non-native English speakers, ensuring that complex scientific ideas are communicated with native-level fluency and clarity.

    Document Type: Formal Peer Review Report
    Recommendation: Major Revisions

    Sample Critique

    1. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (Page 8, Line 174)
    The data shows the impedance magnitude increasing at frequencies higher than 10^5 Hz. This behavior is physically inconsistent with standard electrode models, where high-frequency impedance should represent the solution resistance (a constant value). This anomaly suggests a potential artifact in the measurement setup that must be addressed before publication.

    2. Unsupported Mechanical Claims (Page 3, Line 64)
    The authors highlight “reducing mechanical mismatch” as a primary justification for the design but fail to characterize the mechanical properties of the bulk needle material. Since the PEDOT layer likely contributes negligibly to the overall stiffness compared to the bulk polymer, the authors must provide the Young’s modulus of the needle itself to substantiate this claim.

    3. Reference Electrode Validity (Methods, Line 305)
    The protocol describes using a Ag/AgCl wire directly in acetonitrile without a salt bridge. This configuration is known to cause potential drift and contamination. Standard practice for non-aqueous solvents requires a double-junction reference electrode to ensuring reproducibility.

    4. Charge Transfer Analysis
    The manuscript claims “enhanced” charge transfer properties but does not normalize the current by the geometric surface area. Without reporting the current density, it is impossible to determine if the improvement is due to the material properties of the PEDOT coating or simply an increase in effective surface area from the vertical extension.

    paper Scientific Writing & Academic Editing

    Project Overview

    This preprint (10.1101/2025.09.29.679383) excerpt demonstrates my ability to synthesize complex interdisciplinary concepts (microfabrication + neuroscience) into a clear, compelling scientific narrative.

    Publication Title: Beyond the Straight Path: High-Density Laminar Recordings in the Ventral Hippocampus with Curved Microprobes

    Abstract

    Brain function is governed by neural circuits distributed across an intricate, three-dimensional landscape of anatomically complex structures. Current methods for monitoring neural activity are limited to investigating structures that lie along a single, linear trajectory. While this approach is effective for columnar regions, such as dorsal cortical areas or the relatively planar dorsal hippocampus, it fails in deep or curved structures, like the ventral hippocampus, where a linear probe can only achieve with difficulty the combination of physical access and perpendicular orientation required for recordings across all layers.

    To overcome this limitation, we developed a multisite microelectrode array with a pre-formed curved geometry, engineered to align perpendicularly with neuronal layers in deep anatomical targets regardless of their orientation. This interface integrates a polymer-based array, featuring 16 PEDOT:BF4-coated microelectrodes for robust signal acquisition, with a dissolvable silk stiffener for precise surgical insertion. The resulting device exhibited excellent electrical properties (avg. impedance 18 kΩ) and enabled accurate placement across the distinct neuronal layers of the ventral hippocampus CA1 region. These capabilities allowed for successful recordings of both local field potentials and single-unit activity from this region, providing a powerful new tool to investigate the network dynamics of previously inaccessible neural circuits.

    Introduction (Excerpt)

    A fundamental mismatch exists between the intricate, three-dimensional architecture of the brain and the linear design of the tools used to study it. For nearly a century, deep brain-penetrating electrodes have relied on a single, straight geometry, creating a critical blind spot in our ability to investigate non-planar neural circuits. This limitation is especially pronounced when accessing deep or curved regions, such as the ventral hippocampus, where a straight probe cannot simultaneously achieve physical access and maintain a perpendicular orientation to the target’s neuronal layers. This gap in our technological capabilities prevents high-fidelity recordings from many circuits essential for understanding complex behaviors and neurological disorders.